I just started to work CW DXing on 20m, still not good on CW but i am learning it at least for DXing, not ready for ragchewing yet.
To view my log, please visit and login to QRZ.com
This is my page, http://qrz.com/db/9m2pju
If you hear me, please reply! 73 SK E E
p/s: from the IARU manual and guideline book, E E means bye bye.
Rare and collectible item. Suitable for guitar hobbyist. posted from Bloggeroid
DroidPSK is an app for Android to decode and encode Ham Radio BPSK31 with the build in microphone/speaker or wired to your radio. A waterf...
Wednesday, September 21, 2011
Monday, September 19, 2011
An electromagnetic wave consists of the electric and magnetic components. These components repeat or oscillate at right angles to each other and to the direction of propagation, and are in phase with each other.
All electromagnetic energy, regardless of frequency or wavelength, passes through a perfect vacuum at the speed of light (300 million meters per second) in the form of sinusoidal waves.
The Radio Spectrum - As radio and TV DXers, we are of course most interested in the "radio" portion of the electromagnetic spectrum, which exists between the frequencies of 10 Kilohertz and 300 Gigahertz, with wavelengths from 30,000 kilometers to 1 millimeter. As the frequency of a signal is increased, its wavelength becomes shorter. For example, an electromagnetic wave at 750 KHz in the middle of the AM broadcast band has a wavelength of approximately 400 meters. As we increase the frequency to 100 MHz in the middle of the FM band, the wavelength decreases to about 3 meters.
The frequencies of interest to the FM and TV DXer are situated within the Very High Frequency (VHF) and Ultra High Frequency (UHF) regions of the radio spectrum. The VHF portion of the radio spectrum is between 30 and 300 Megahertz, while UHF is situated between 300 and 3,000 Megahertz. The frequencies used for the FM band and television channels 2 through 13 lie within the VHF portion of the electromagnetic spectrum, while television channels 14 through 83 are within the UHF portion of the spectrum.
Signal Propagation - When we refer to signal propagation, we are talking about the radio signal getting from one place to another, presumably from the station's transmitting antenna to the receiver's antenna. Signals at VHF and UHF frequencies can be propagated by a variety of means or "modes". Depending on the particular mode that is dominate at the time of reception, the distances covered by VHF and UHF signals can extend hundreds or even thousands of miles. Here are some of the more common modes for VHF and UHF propagation:
Ground Wave - Ground wave propagated signals are signals that, generically speaking, travel along or close to the Earth's surface on their path between the transmitting and receiving antennas. Ground wave signals are the "local" signals we receive -- the signals that are always present at your location, day and night, regardless of any any particular atmospheric or ionospheric conditions.
The ground wave actually consists of two components, the surface wave and the space wave. The terms "surface wave", "space wave" and "ground wave" are often used interchangeably, even though it's not exactly correct to do so.
The surface wave travels out from the transmitting antenna, remaining in contact with the Earth's surface. The surface wave is primarily responsible for the reception of local AM broadcast signals. The strength of the surface wave diminishes rapidly with distance because the Earth is a not a particularly good electrical conductor. Also, the attenuation of surface wave signals increases rapidly as the signal frequency is increased. At FM and TV frequencies the surface wave is virtually nonexistent. The surface wave is generally not a factor in our reception of FM and TV signals, local or otherwise.
Reception of local FM and TV signals relies almost entirely upon the space wave component of the ground wave. The space wave signal path is the so-called "line-of-sight" path between the transmit and receive antennas. The curvature of the Earth is the primary limiting factor for the maximum distance a space wave propagated signal can travel. The space wave will travel outward from the transmitting antenna until it reaches the horizon. Beyond that point, the space wave is blocked by the Earth itself, and reception is no longer possible for a receiver located on the surface of the Earth (as most are). It's important to note, however, that the optical horizon (the horizon you can see) and the "radio horizon" are not quite the same. In reality, the space wave does not quite travel in a straight line as it moves away from the transmitting antenna. Instead, the signal travels in a slightly downward curved path that keeps it nearer to the Earth's surface, thus extending its path a little further than the optical horizon.
If you are into math, the approximate distance (in miles) to the radio horizon can be calculated by multiplying the square root of the antenna height (in feet) by 1.415 times. For example, the theoretical distance to the radio horizon for an antenna 1,000 feet above the ground is just under 45 miles.
Refraction, Refraction, Refraction - Refraction is defined as "...a change in direction of a wave as it crosses the boundary that separates one medium from another." While this may sound a little imposing, it's really a simple principle of physics -- one that we probably observe daily. Refraction, in one form or another, is the primary mechanism that enables long-distance FM and TV reception.
Refraction comes into play when a wave enters a new medium at an angle of less than 90°. As the wave enters the new medium, a change in the wave's speed occurs sooner on one side of the wave than on the other. This causes the wave's direction of travel to be bent.
Under normal conditions, a signal that is not blocked or obstructed simply travels in a straight line out into space, never to return to Earth again. However, various atmospheric conditions often cause the normal path of FM and TV signals to be bent downward, returning the signal to the surface of the Earth, sometimes a great distance from its point of origin.
Tropospheric Enhancements - Within the broad classification of tropospheric enhancement, there are several different and distinct propagation modes that make it possible for FM and TV signals to travel far greater distances than the normal radio line-of-sight horizon.
Tropospheric Scatter - Tropospheric scatter is the most common form of tropospheric enhancement. Tropo-scatter is always present to some degree just about everywhere. Tropospheric scatter at FM and TV frequencies is caused when the paths of radio signals are altered by slight changes in the refractive index in the lower atmosphere caused by air turbulence, and small changes in temperature, humidity and barometric pressure. The signal is scattered in random fashion. The tiny portion of the transmitted signal that is scattered forward and downward from what is called the "common scattering volume" is responsible for signal paths longer than the normal line-of-sight horizon.
Tropo-scatter enables the reception of signals from out to about 500 miles, depending primarily on the the power of the transmitting station and the quality of the receiving equipment being used. Maximum tropo-scatter path distances of 200 to 300 are more typical on a day-to-day basis. Tropo scattered signals are characteristically weak, "fluttery" signals that often suffer from random fading.
Tropospheric Refraction - The "standard" atmosphere is defined as air at sea level having a temperature of 59° F, a barometric pressure of 29.92 inches of mercury, and a density of 0.002378 slugs per cubic foot. As we increase altitude within our standard atmosphere, the temperature, pressure and density decrease at fixed rates. The U.S. version of the standard atmosphere table for altitudes up to 10,000 feet looks like this...
Various weather conditions increase the refractive index of the atmosphere, thus extending signal propagation distances. Stable signals with good signal strength from 500+ miles away are not uncommon when the refractive index of the atmosphere is fairly high.
Tropospheric Ducting - This is where things start getting interesting for the FM and TV DXer. Strong temperature inversions with very well defined boundaries sometimes form from as high as several thousand feet above the surface of the Earth. If the inversion is strong enough, a signal crossing the boundary into the inversion will be bent sufficiently to return it to Earth. The inversion boundary layer and the surface of the Earth form the upper and lower walls of a "duct" that acts much like an open-ended wave guide. Signals "trapped" in the duct follow the curvature of the Earth, sometimes for hundreds or even thousands of miles. In the tropics and over large bodies of water, strong inversions that cover large geographic areas are quite common, and stable ducts can remain in tact for days on end. This form of ducting is responsible for fairly reliable propagation between California and Hawaii at VHF and higher frequencies.
While somewhat less common, ducts sometimes form between atmospheric boundary layers at much higher altitudes, with the upper boundary having an altitude as high as 10,000 feet or more. The upper refractive layer bends signals downward, while the lower refractive boundary bends the signals upward, forming a signal-trapping duct that acts much like a wave guide. When this condition exists, FM band signals can travel thousands of miles. Indeed, there is no theoretical limit to the distance a signal can travel via tropospheric ducting. With respect to the receiving station, tropospherically ducted signals will usually come from a geographically selective area. A distant station may be heard in favor of a closer station on the same frequency. Sometimes conditions are such that multiple ducts form, bringing in distant stations from many different areas at the same time.
An interesting characteristic of this form of ducting is that both the transmitting and receiving antennas must be inside of the duct to gain the maximum signal enhancement. A receiving antenna located outside of the duct will hear little or no signal from a transmitting antenna located inside the duct. For this type of duct to be useful to us, the signal must get in and exit the duct somewhere along the signal path. This can occur if the ends of a duct are open at each end, or through "holes" that form along the bottom layer of the duct.
A basic principal of radio is that the wavelength of a signal gets shorter as the frequency of the signal is increased. Because of this, the size of the tropospheric duct determines the lowest signal frequency that it can successfully propagate. This is knows as the Lowest Usable Frequency or LUF of the duct. A physically small duct, a duct with its upper and lower boundaries close together, will propagate only higher frequency signals with very short wavelengths. As the distance between the boundaries of the duct increases, the signal frequency the duct will propagate decreases. In other words, a larger duct will accommodate a lower frequency signal having a physically longer wavelength. It's possible for a duct to form that only supports signal propagation at UHF television frequencies, while not effectively passing anything in the VHF television or FM bands.
Ducted signals from 900 - 1,000 miles are fairly common, but it's more common for ducted signals to travel 500 - 800 miles. Ducted signals are typically quite strong, sometimes so strong that they can cause interference to local signals on the same frequency.
Weather Suitable for a Duct - Tropospheric ducting most often occurs because of a dramatic increase in temperature at higher altitudes. If the temperature inversion layer has a lower humidity than the air below or above it, the refractive index of the layer will be enhanced further. There are several common weather conditions that often bring about strong temperature inversions.
While not usually the cause of strong ducting, radiation inversions can bring about pronounced signal enhancement, extending the DX range up to a few hundred miles. This is probably the the most common and widespread form of inversion a DXer is likely to encounter on a regular basis.
A radiation inversion forms over land after sunset. The Earth cools by radiating heat into space. This is a progressive process where the radiation of surface heat upwards causes further cooling at the Earth's surface as cooler air moves in to replace the upward moving warm air. At higher altitudes the air tends to cool more slowly, thus setting up the inversion. This process often continues all the way through the night until dawn, sometimes producing inversion layers at 1,000 to 2,000 feet above the ground.
Radiation inversions are most common during the summer months on clear, calm nights. The effect is diminished by blowing winds, cloud cover and wet ground. Radiation inversions are often more pronounced in dry climates, in valleys and over large expanses of flat, open ground.
Another meteorological process called "subsidence" often produces strong ducting conditions and excellent DX. Subsidence is the process of sinking air that becomes compressed and heated as it descends. This process often causes strong temperature inversions to form at altitudes ranging from 1,000 feet to as high as 10,000 feet. Subsidence is commonly produced by large, slow-moving high-pressure zones (anticyclones). These almost stationary high-pressure zones often form over the eastern half of the United States during the late summer and early fall months. They usually move out of Canada, traveling toward the southeast. As the high-pressure zone stalls over the Midwest, strong inversions form, bringing outstanding 1,000+ mile DX that can last for days at a time. This condition is most common in the Southeastern states and lower Midwest. It also shows up from time to time in the upper Midwest and East Coast states. It rarely shows up in the Western states.
The following weather maps are from September 5 and 6 of 2001. They provide a real-world illustration of tropospheric ducting associated with a slow moving high-pressure zone.
On September 5th, 2001, a very slow moving high-pressure zone was pushing out of Canada toward the southeast. As the high was centered over Northern Michigan, we observed excellent tropospheric DX conditions here in Lexington, Kentucky. Strong FM and TV signals out of Minnesota, North and South Dakota, Iowa, and Illinois were plentiful throughout the day. Signals from 800-900 miles were common.
On September 6, 2001, a full 24 hours later, the sluggish high pressure zone had moved only as far as western New York. Here in Lexington, our DX zone had expanded east. The 800-900 mile TV and FM signals from the Midwest were still present, but strong signals from the Northeast as far away as central Ontario were also added to the mix. This excellent DX "opening" lasted almost a full 48 hours.
In the northern hemisphere, the strongest signals and longest signal paths will usually be observed to the south of the high-pressure center. In the southern hemisphere, the reverse is true -- the best signal paths will be to the north of the high-pressure center. Subsidence ducting is often intensified during the evening and early morning hours when the effects of radiation inversions are added to the mix.
Well positioned warm and cold fronts sometimes bring about ducting and enhanced DX conditions.
A warm front is the surface boundary between a mass of warm air flowing over an area of cooler, relatively stationary air. Enhanced DX conditions will often be observed out to approximately 100 miles ahead of the advancing front. The best paths will be along a line parallel to the frontal boundary.
Likewise, cold fronts can also produce some nice DX conditions. A cold front is the surface boundary between a mass of cooler air that pushes itself under a mass more stationary warm air. This forces the warm air up and behind the advancing front. The ducts produced by a passing cold front are often unstable. The best signal paths will be behind and along a line that's parallel to the advancing front.
On November 9, 2001, this cold front and well-positioned high-pressure zone (over southeast Kansas) produced a full day of outstanding tropospheric FM and TV DX here in Lexington. We were solidly open to Arkansas, Alabama, Louisiana and Mississippi. Path distances were upwards of 600 miles with very strong signals.
On December 7, 2001, this well positioned cold front produced excellent DX paths into eastern Tennessee. This very geographically selective opening didn't produce very long signal paths, but even low power stations were heard with very strong signals.
Since the tropospheric enhancements we've covered so far are all weather related, you can see why it's important for the DXer to pay attention to day-to-day weather conditions.Sporadic E - This is probably the most interesting and exciting forms of signal enhancement for the FM and TV DXer. Highly ionized patches or "clouds" occasionally form in the E region of the ionosphere at altitudes between approximately 50 and 70 miles. We call these sporadic E clouds. Sporadic E clouds are usually fairly small in size, but larger clouds or multiple clouds often form during substantial openings. These clouds often, but not always, travel from their point of origin to the north and northwest at speeds up to several hundred miles per hour.
It's interesting to note that after almost 70 years of study the true cause for sporadic E is still unknown. There are many different theories as to how and why sporadic E clouds form.
It was once believed that the formation of sporadic E clouds was directly related to the eleven year solar (sunspot) cycle. You'll still see that theory expressed in some text books even though overwhelming evidence suggests that this belief is wrong. There seems to be no correlation between the ionization level or formation of sporadic E clouds and the eleven year sunspot cycle - at least not in the mid latitudes away from the geomagnetic equator and poles. It was noted all the way back in the 1930s and 1940s that the formation and intensity of mid-latitude sporadic E clouds does not substantially vary over the course of the eleven year solar cycle.
There is evidence to suggest that the primary cause of sporadic E cloud formation is wind shear, a purely weather-related phenomenon. Intense high altitude winds, traveling in opposite directions at different altitudes, produce wind shear. It is believed that these wind shears, in the presence of Earth's geomagnetic field, cause ions to be collected and compressed into a thin, ion-rich layers, approximately one-half to one mile in thickness. The area of these patches can vary from a few square miles to hundreds or even thousands of square miles.
Along the same line is the theory that sporadic E clouds are formed in the vicinity of thunderstorms by the intense electrical activity associated with the storm. There is often (but not always) a correlation between thunderstorm activity and the formation of sporadic E clouds, enough to make this theory very tantalizing. However, strong thunderstorms often form along frontal boundaries, and intense wind sheer is usually found along the same frontal boundaries that produce thunderstorms. Likewise, strong sporadic E activity often appears when there is no apparent thunderstorm activity along or near the propagation path.
Yet another emerging theory suggests that sporadic E clouds are formed by concentrations of meteoric debris. Again, there seems to be a strong correlation between meteor shower activity and the number and intensity of sporadic E clouds.
The point is, nobody has presented a definitive explanation for how and why sporadic E clouds form. There are many excellent papers on the subject. Just enter "sporadic E" into your favorite search engine, and start reading. It's entirely possible (perhaps even likely) that sporadic E clouds are formed as the result of a combination of factors, perhaps involving wind shear, cosmic debris and thunderstorm activity.
The amount by which the path of a radio signal is refracted by sporadic E clouds depends on the intensity of ionization and the frequency of the signal. For a given level of ionization, the signal refraction angle will decrease as the frequency is increased. Above a certain critical frequency, refraction of the signal will be insufficient to return it to the surface of the Earth. This critical frequency is known as the Maximum Usable Frequency or MUF.
Sporadic E is very common on the low VHF TV channels during the summer months. From time to time, the intensity of Sporadic E cloud ionization increases to the point where the MUF rises into and sometimes above FM band frequencies (88 to 108 MHz). It is common for the MUF to rise up to and then stop at a particular frequency within the FM band. Distant signals will be heard below the MUF, while only local or tropospherically enhanced signals will be heard above the MUF. It has been observed over the years that the signal strength of received sporadic E signals will be greatest just below the Maximum Usable Frequency. Also, since the bending angle (angle of refraction) decreases as signal frequency is increased for a given ionization level, we can surmise that the most distant receptions will occur as we approach the MUF. In other words, an Es cloud will support longer signals paths at 100 MHz than it will at 50 MHz.
The above illustration shows an actual Es cloud configuration and the associated skip zone that occurred during the summer of 2001. Three different DXers are represented by the numbers 1, 2 and 3. The Es cloud was over Eastern Kansas and Western Missouri. The yellow band is the DX zone. Using the same sporadic E cloud, a DXer in one part of the country will hear one assortment of stations while a DXer in a different part of the country will hear a completely different set of stations. If the DXers were to plot lines between their respective locations and the stations they were each hearing (as I did here), the approximate location of the sporadic E cloud will be above where the lines intersect. You will note that both the DXer and the stations being received are in the yellow shaded DX zone. DXers outside the yellow shaded zone did not benefit from this particular Es cloud.
DXer #1 (me), located in Lexington, KY, heard stations in New Mexico and Colorado. DXer #2, in West Texas heard stations in Wisconsin and Michigan. DXer #3, located in Western South Dakota heard stations in Mississippi and Alabama.
Es signal paths are usually bi-directional. In other words, if the DXer in Kentucky is hearing FM stations in Colorado, a DXer in Colorado will be able to hear stations in Kentucky.Since Es clouds often move with respect to the receiving station, the DXer will often hear a changing selection of distant signals.
Various geometries of Sporadic E Signal Propagation
A sporadic E cloud producing short to medium distance skip at lower frequencies (TV channel 2, for example) is likely to produce longer skip at FM frequencies if the MUF is high enough.
The maximum distance for a single-hop sporadic E propagated signal is approximately 1,500 miles. However, if multiple, sufficiently ionized patches exist in a line along a particular signal path, it's possible for a given signal to reflect off the surface of the Earth after the first hop and get refracted back to Earth by a second sporadic E cloud. This can extend the range of E-layer propagated signals out to 3,000 miles and beyond. Statistically speaking, the "average" skip distance for sporadic E propagated FM DX seems to be between 950 and 1,050 miles. During 2001 I received 205 stations via sporadic E (a decent statistical sample). The average distance of these receptions was 997 miles.
Single-hop E-layer propagated signals are often as strong as local signals. Indeed, I have witnessed more than one situation where a local station was completely "covered" by a distant one, only a few miles from the local station's transmitter location (that's when they call the engineer to see if he can "fix" the problem). Since the surface of the Earth is not a very good signal reflector, multi-hop E-layer propagated signals will usually be weaker than single-hop signals, and are often covered by signals coming from stations in the single hop zone. If the mid-point of a double-hope happens to be on water (such as the ocean), the signals will be stronger and the there will likely be no interference from mid-point stations (unless someone happens to be operating an FM or TV broadcast station aboard a ship!).
Sometimes we hear stations via Sporadic E that don't seem to fit the normal model in terms of path distance. It's not uncommon to receive signals beyond the range of what would be considered "normal" for a single hop, but at less than the range expected for "normal" double hop.
Many theories have been advanced to explain this phenomenon, including paths along multiple, tilted sporadic E clouds. Here's an illustration of how this might work.
Geometry of "Tilted" Es Cloud-to-Cloud Signal Propagation
Based on both Earth and satellite based ionosonde readings and readings from rockets sent through Es clouds, it is known that tilted Es clouds do form. As such, this theory does provide at least one plausible explanation for longer than "normal" Es signal propagation paths.
I think there is another, simpler means by which Es signals are propagated longer than "normal" distances out to almost double-hop distances. This would also account for receptions where signals from double-hop distances are received without the usual interference from stations in the single hop zone.
Geometry of "Non-Tilted" Es Cloud-to-Cloud Signal Propagation
In this illustration, neither Es cloud is sufficiently ionized to return a single-hop signal to Earth. However, with the two "weak" clouds working together, the refraction angles of each Es cloud are essentially added. This would have the effect of raising the apparent Maximum Usable Frequency and ultimately returning the signal to Earth at a greater than "normal" Es distance. This is a somewhat more simple (thus more likely) Es cloud configuration than that of the "tilted" cloud theory. It would account for variable path distances which fall between that of "normal" single- and double-hop sporadic E path distances.
In theory, a similar configuration could exist with three or more Es clouds, producing much longer signal paths. However, as the complexity of the signal path geometry increases, the likelihood of such configurations forming and becoming usable diminishes.
Other Es cloud configurations are certainly possible. Picture, for example, a larger sporadic E cloud, which is not uniformly ionized...
Possible Path Geometry of a Large Es Cloud with Non-uniform Ionization
A signal entering the "weaker" side of the large Es cloud does not return to Earth. Instead, it is propagated to a part of the Es cloud that is more intensely ionized. Ionization in this region of the Es cloud is sufficient to return the signal to Earth. The effect of such a configuration is not fundamentally different than the tilted cloud or cloud-to-cloud examples presented above. It is another possible means by which Es signals can be propagated longer than "normal" single-hop distances.
In the northern hemisphere, seasonal sporadic E season peaks occur during the months of May, June and July. An additional minor peak often occurs in late December around Christmas time when the Sporadic E season is at its summertime peak in the southern hemisphere. One theory to explain this phenomenon is that intense sporadic E clouds formed in the vicinity of the equator manage to hold their configuration as they drift toward the north and northwest, thus producing our short December sporadic E DX season. The best time of day for sporadic E seems to be mid morning and mid afternoon. However, sporadic E DX can happen at anytime, day or night, and can pop up any time of the year. Sporadic E DX usually lasts from a few minutes to a few hours. However, I've seen it last several full days and nights, causing a great lack of sleep!
Aurora Effect - During periods of high solar and geomagnetic activity, aurora or "northern lights" may be present. FM signals can be returned to Earth from the auroral curtain. However, the constantly varying intensity of the aurora and its highly variable reflectivity give auroral propagated signals a fluttery quality. The flutter will usually be in the range of 100 Hz to 2,000 Hz, producing a "buzz" in the received signal. In some cases, this effect can be so strong, normal voice or music modulation ends up becoming distorted to the point of unintelligibility. In the northern hemisphere, auroral propagated signals will generally come from the north, regardless of the true direction of the transmitting station.
Meteor Scatter - This interesting form of enhancement results from signals bouncing off of the intensely ionized trails of meteors entering and "burning up" in the E region of the ionosphere. The strength and duration of meteor scatter signals decreases with increasing frequency. Thus, the effect is much more pronounced at the lower FM band frequencies than at the upper end of the band. Meteor scatter can be heard anywhere, anytime of the day or night. However, bursts are more plentiful around dawn, and during known major meteor showers.
Summary - There are other, more esoteric signal propagation modes that are often at work to enhance long-distance reception of FM signals. Signals bounce off of airplanes and even formations of birds. With the right equipment, it's even theoretically possible to recover broadcast signals bounced off the surface of the moon! However, the propagation modes outlined above are the more common ones you are likely to encounter while FM DXing.
Note: All the propagation mode illustrations shown here, are obviously not drawn to scale. The signal "bending" angles shown are very exaggerated. In reality, they are usually fairly slight angles.
Following are the frequency ranges used in satellite communications.
L-band (390 MHz-1.55 GHz) GPS satellites, satellite phones, misc commsats, SETI outer space exploration S-band (1.55-5.2 GHz) weather satellites, XM/Sirius radio C-band (3-7 GHz) (first satellite band) misc GEO commsats, cable TV, satellite TV (7-10 ft. steerable dishes) X-band (8-12 GHz) misc commsats Ku-band (11-15 GHz) TV network satellite distribution, misc commsats, satellite TV (18" dishes) Ka-band (18-40 GHz) misc commsats, satellite phone backhaul
The spectrum for transmission in singlemode optical fibers has been broken into the following wavelength ranges, or bands. Typically, the wavelengths transmitted in multimode fibers are around 850 and 1310 nm, known originally as first window and second window.
Wavelength Range Band Name In Nanometers (nm) O-band Original 1260 - 1360 E-band Extended 1360 - 1460 S-band Short 1460 - 1530 C-band Conventional 1530 - 1565 L-band Long 1565 - 1625 U-band Ultra-long 1625 - 1675
The distance between crests of a wave. The wavelength determines the nature of the various forms of radiant energy that comprise the electromagnetic spectrum. For electromagnetic waves, the wavelength in meters is computed by the speed of light divided by frequency (300,000,000/Hz). For sound waves, the wavelength is determined by 335/Hz.
The wavelength is the distance between crests. The higher the frequency, the shorter the wavelength.
The wavelengths of light that humans can see range from approximately 400 nm to 750 nm.
Sunday, September 18, 2011
Last night, the 10m band was open and i managed to made a contact with local station, 9W2TS from Kajang, Selangor.
Saturday, September 17, 2011
The South East Asia Amateur Radio Network (SEANET) was established in 1964 on 20m (14.320 MHz plus or minus QRM). The objective of this Net is to promote international understanding and fellowship among hams and to relay emergency, medical, urgent or priority traffic. This on-the-air meeting which has taken place without fail daily at 1200 UTC has strengthened unity and co-operation among Hams around the world, especially those within the region. The net also provides Hams a facility for testing their equipment and propagation conditions on the 20m band.
Thursday, September 15, 2011
Just an idea, not going to be as good as real hardwares. But, to those who are living in limited space and prefer software than the hardwares, i'm sure this is the best for you.
Lets get in to the idea, this is how it will be going.
- An iPhone or iPad
- iRig Mic
- VocaLive app for audio processing
- an iBox from W2IHY
- Connect the iRig Mic to your iPhone or iPad
- from the iPhone or iPad, connect the output to the iBox
- from the iBox to the transceiver
- configure the VocaLive app to the best result for your vocals.
Get details about iRig Mic here http://www.ikmultimedia.com/irigmic/features/
p/s: eSSB Hi Fi sounds ominous. These terms can be somewhat confusing since true "Hi-fi" is an old stereophonic audio term referring to true High-fidelity audio - e.g. 20Hz ~ 20kHz of flat frequency response with very low Total Harmonic distortion (THD) and good Signal-To-Noise (S/N) characteristics. By this definition, any Amateur Radio transmission (SSB or AM) hardly qualifies as absolute true Hi-fi http://www.nu9n.com/essb.html
Tuesday, September 13, 2011
- Ham, "Ham: a poor operator. A 'plug.'" That's the definition of the word given in G. M. Dodge's The Telegraph Instructor even before radio. The definition has never changed in wire telegraphy. The first wireless operators were landline telegraphers who left their offices to go to sea or to man the coastal stations. They brought with them their language and much of the tradition of their older profession. In those early days, spark was king and every station occupied the same wavelength-or, more accurately perhaps, every station occupied the whole spectrum with its broad spark signal. Government stations, ships, coastal stations and the increasingly numerous amateur operators all competed for time and signal supremacy in each other's receivers. Many of the amateur stations were very powerful. Two amateurs, working each other across town, could effectively jam all the other operations in the area. When this happened, frustrated commercial operators would call the ship whose weaker signals had been blotted out by amateurs and say "SRI OM THOSE #&$!@ HAMS ARE JAMMING YOU." Amateurs, possibly unfamiliar with the real meaning of the term, picked it up and applied it to themselves in true "Yankee Doodle" fashion and wore it with pride. As the years advanced, the original meaning has completely disappeared. -Louise Ramsey Moreau W3WRE/WB6BBO
- The Q Code, The Q Code came into being internationally in 1912 to overcome the language problems involved in communications by radio among ships and shore stations of all countries. The original list of 50 adopted by international agreement in London contain many which are still familiar to amateur operators-QRN, QRM, QSO, the traffic operator's QRK, QSY and QRV - are now nearing the century mark of continuous usage. QSL still has the official 1912 definition despite the changed informal usages it is subjected to in amateur parlance. The QN signals for amateur net operation were introduced in the late 1930s by E. L. Battey W1UE (W4IA-SK) to lighten the burdens of net control operators.
- CQ, The telegraph call CQ was born on the English Telegraph over a century ago as a signal meaning "All stations. A notification to all postal telegraph offices to receive the message." Its meaning was close to the present meanings of QNC and QST. Like many other telegraph terms which originated on the landlines, CQ was brought over into radio and used as a general call to all ships by the Marconi Company. Other companies used KA until the London Convention of 1912, which adopted CQ as the international general call or "attention" signal. CQ still means, literally, "attention" but in amateur radio its meaning is perhaps more accurately described by Thomas Raddell who compared it to yelling "Hey, Mac!" down a drain pipe. But why the letters CQ? From the French, sécurité, (safety or, as intended here, pay attention)
- 73, The traditional expression "73" goes right back to the beginning of the landline telegraph days. It is found in some of the earliest editions of the numerical codes, each with a different definition, but each with the same idea in mind--it indicated that the end, or signature, was coming up. But there are no data to prove that any of these were used. The first authentic use of 73 is in the publication The National Telegraph Review and Operators' Guide, first published in April 1857. At that time, 73 meant "My love to you!" Succeeding issues of this publication continued to use this definition of the term. Curiously enough, some of the other numerals then used have the same definition now that they had then, but within a short time, the use of 73 began to change. In the National Telegraph Convention, the numeral was changed from the Valentine-type sentiment to a vague sign of fraternalism. Here, 73 was a greeting, a friendly "word" between operators and it was so used on all wires. In 1859, the Western Union Company set up the standard "92 Code". A list of numerals from one to 92 was compiled to indicate a series of prepared phrases for use by the operators on the wires. Here, in the 92 Code, 73 changes from a fraternal sign to a very flowery "accept my compliments," which was in keeping with the florid language of that era. Over the years from 1859 to 1900, the many manuals of telegraphy show variations of this meaning. Dodge's The Telegraph Instructor shows it merely as "compliments." The Twentieth Century Manual of Railway and Commercial Telegraphy defines it two ways, one listing as "my compliments to you;" but in the glossary of abbreviations it is merely "compliments." Theodore A. Edison's Telegraphy Self-Taught shows a return to "accept my compliments." By 1908, however, a later edition of the Dodge Manual gives us today's definition of "best regards" with a backward look at the older meaning in another part of the work where it also lists it as "compliments." "Best regards" has remained ever since as the "put-it-down-in-black-and-white" meaning of 73 but it has acquired overtones of much warmer meaning. Today, amateurs use it more in the manner that James Reid had intended that it be used --a "friendly word between operators."
- SOS, The amateur distress call, QRRR, grew from the purpose of the first organized amateur emergency nets. They were set up in cities along the Pennsylvania Railroad to aid the "Pennsy" (and later other railroads) with train communications in the event of failure of the railroad telegraph landlines--which were frequent. The signal QRR came to be used to indicate that the calling station had railroad traffic related to some emergency. ARRL eventually adopted this call for use by any amateur who had distress traffic and later the call was changed to QRRR because of a conflict in definitions with the international Q signal QRR. One of the first distress calls was CQD, coined by the Marconi Company about 1904 from the "general call" CQ and the letter D for "distress." The main problem with CQD was that it was supposed to be used only by ships which subscribed to the Marconi radio system and ships of one system were discouraged from communicating with ships or shore stations of other, competing, companies. The problem got so bad that it was taken up in the international radio conference in 1906 where a new universal distress call was proposed. The American delegation suggested the letters NC which were already recognized in the International Signal Code for Visual Signalling. The German delegation proposed its own SOE which was already in use on German ships as a general inquiry signal similar to CQ (which was then used only by the Marconi system). The British delegation, of course, wanted to stick to the Marconi signal CQD. The convention found SOE acceptable except that the final E could easily be lost in QRN so the letter S was substituted, making it SOS. The convention decided that SOS should be sent as a single code character with a sound unlike any other character, thus arresting the attention of anyone hearing it. So was officially adopted, but CQD remained in use for some years, particularly aboard British ships. It wasn't until 1912, after the Titanic disaster, that SOS became universal and the use of CQD gradually disappeared. Titanic radio operator Jack Phillips sent both CQD and SOS to be sure that there couldn't possibly be any misunderstanding.
- Mayday, Incidentally, another distress call is used by aircraft in trouble throughout the world. We have all heard the term "mayday" at some time. This, of course, has nothing to do with the first day in May. As it turns out, in French, the word "m'aidez" means "help me". Is it possible that American aviators in World War I picked this up from their French comrades and mispronounced it as the easily recognized "mayday, mayday"?
- The Prosigns, Many of the expressions and procedure signals still in use in radiotelegraph had their origins in the early days of the landline telegraph--long before Marconi sent his letter "S" across the Atlantic. In sending formal messages by CW, the first thing a beginner hears is "don't send punctuation. Separate the parts of the address from each other with the prosign AA." This is ironic, because in the American Morse Code the sound didahdidah is a comma and was doubtless the origin of our prosign. Originally, a correctly addressed letter was punctuated with commas following the name and the street address, each of which was (and still is) on a separate line although the commas have been dropped, even in mail addresses on letters. The comma was transmitted by Morse operators and thus, AA came to mean that the receiving operator should "drop down one line" when sent after each part of the address and it is so defined in the operating manuals of the time. Our familiar prosign SK also had its origin in landline Morse. In the Western Union company's "92 code" used even before the American Civil War, the number 30 meant "the end. No more." It also meant "good night." It so happens that in Landline Morse, 30 is sent didididahdit daaah, the zero being a long dash. Run the 30 together and it has the same sound as SK.
- The Amateur Message Form, The amateur message form comes to us from a long tradition. The earliest telegrams were very formal, in the florid style of the last half of the 19th century. Even the train orders of that time began with Dear Sir and ended with yours truly. However, since telegraph companies charged by the word, the text soon changed to the present style. The preamble, however, has changed greatly. At first, the date and the number of words were the only two items listed in this country. The European telegram included the time and the office call, but it was not until after the Civil War that Americans began using these as well. The main reason for using the group count was to be able to calculate charges for the messages, as well as to insure accuracy. This provision was printed on the earliest Western Union blanks as well as those of the Electric Telegraph Company in England, but the idea is far earlier than either of these. It was used by the French semaphore system before the wire telegraph. The amateur preamble, of course, is derived from the early wireless forms. The printed Marconigram blanks have much the same information which is required for the heading of amateur messages, including the service information at the bottom of the blanks. Those ARL numbered texts have an interesting and even longer history. In 1844 Alfred Vail was concerned about preserving the secrecy of the message and therefore prepared a series of numbered messages which could be selected for use by the public. Numbered texts are no longer used for secrecy, they facilitate the rapid transmission of messages. Two of our most commonly used service abbreviations --ASAP and GBA-- date back to the 1840s when the early press telegraphers cut everything to the most abbreviated form in order to bypass the exceedingly high rates imposed by the telegraph companies.
- The International Code, Although Samuel F. B. Morse's code achieved nearly universal use on the landline telegraph systems of America, the Europeans never did like it. They felt that the "space" characters were likely to cause errors in receiving. (The letter "O," for example, was sent "dit dit" and the "I" was sent as in the now familiar International Code: "didit.") The Europeans developed a number of binary dot-dash codes to suit their own needs. The code in use on the wires of the Prussian Empire in 1852 bore a strong resemblance to the present International Code, but it used the American Morse numerals. Seven years later the "European Code" was formulated, using the Austro-Prussian alphabet and adapting the numerals we now use. This was adopted for use by all European countries and the name was changed in 1912 to "International Code," although it is also known, even today, as the "Continental Code." The numerals themselves are interesting. No known code of the European continent shows anything which resembles them. They just showed up in the European Code. However, the Bain Code, used on many lines in the U.S. circa 1846, had numerals which closely match those of the International Code. From one through five, Bain and International are identical. Reversing the Bain Code numerals six through zero produces the International numerals. There is nothing to prove that the Bain Code was the basis for the International numerals, but the conclusion is almost inescapable that someone at the Vienna conference at which International was adopted, was familiar with Bain's numerals. Bain's code was a modification of the Davy code of 1839, so it is possible that the numerals we now use are older than any of the alphabets.
- The Wouff Hong, Every amateur should know and tremble at the history and origins of this fearsome instrument for the punishment of amateurs who cultivate bad operating habits and who nourish and culture their meaner instincts on the air. It was invented--or at any rate, discovered-by "The Old Man" himself, just as amateurs were getting back on the air after World War One. "The Old Man" (who later turned out to be Hiram Percy Maxim, W1AW, co-founder and first president of ARRL) first heard the Wouff Hong described amid the howls and garble of QRM as he tuned across a band filled with signals which exemplified all the rotten operating practices then available to amateurs, considering the state of the art as they knew it. As amateur technology and ingenuity have advanced, we have discovered many new and improved techniques of rotten operating, but we're ahead of our story. As The Old Man heard it, the Wouff Hong was being used on some hapless offender so effectively that he investigated. After further effort, "T.O.M." was able to locate and identify a Wouff Hong. He wrote a number of QST articles about contemporary rotten operating practices and the use of the Wouff Hong to discipline the offenders. Early in 1919, The Old Man wrote in QST "I am sending you a specimen of a real live Wouff Hong which came to light out here . . . Keep it in the editorial sanctum where you can lay hands on it quickly in an emergency." The "specimen of a real live Wouff Hong" was presented to a meeting of the ARRL Board and QST reported later that "each face noticeably blanched when the awful Wouff Hong was . . . laid upon the table." The Board voted that the Wouff Hong be framed and hung in the office of the Secretary of the League. On display today, it's still a sobering influence on every visitor to League Headquarters who has ever swooshed a carrier across a crowded band. The Old Man never prescribed the exact manner in which the Wouff Hong was to be used, but amateurs need only a little imagination to surmise how painful punishments were inflicted on those who stoop to liddish behavior on the air.